What are We?



From a poetic perspective, we can see how our all of our ancient stories generally conserve a metaphor that implies something like ‘the gifts beneath the tree have neither name, nor end, and all of them are yours’.

This is no accident — the minds from which such ‘stories’ emerge are the psybiocognitive result of something which living systems themselves are consistently at miraculous labors to produce: hypersymmetric connectivity.

Upon careful examination, we can see that this form of connectivity is elementally atemporal — it can (in a variety of accessible ways) — ignore time by organismal and cognitive reference to an elemental context in which ‘everything required is accessible to knowing’.

A unification-domain.

Unlike our expectations, ‘the best forms’ of connectivity arise in activities far more alike with children’s games than our sciences or philosophies or even our religions could ever allow us to notice.

Yet each of those ‘knowledge-ways’ I mentioned arose from children’s games...

I mean, what — was our species ‘born adult’?



As it turns out, we are more ‘a transcharactered movement, a unique expression and elaboration game’ than a thing — so if we model ourselves as ‘things’, this damages our minds, and our languages.



:: next ::



Understand : Acknowledge : Support : reSpawn(d) : Prosper