The Art of Dreaming - Wewer Keohane
...shared here by its artist's and spirits' permissions...
with gratitude, honor and love for the all-beings
(white rabbit dancing joyfully with black raven again)
Remember what 99.99%
of all dreamtexts offer as living wisdom:
copying is frozen light - make not in thy worldself a mimic factor,
but instead be made unto fresh things...
in circles of return...
If you've ever looked at a
text in a dream, and remembered it, you're probably familiar
with some cognitive potentials that most of the 'normal' people
around you have no inward comparator for.
You've probably learned one or several of a the experiential
features of dreamtexts - and there very probably isn't
a complete list of those features, either.
There are also some good reasons
why that list isn't on it's way to completion - at least, not
in the way we tend to frame such ideas. Each event or experiencer
is too unique, essentially - regardless of how we as humans decide
to categorize, value, or classify them. Only the allbeing could
list them reasonably - because for one thing, you'd need to be
able to see and understand every event from whatever beginning
point we define (such as the beginning of our 'universe' <- click here for adventure)
to whaterver ending point we'd define (such as the supposed
'death' or 'cessation into void' of our 'universe' ). I won't attempt to pick two random
points in that mess, either (such as the beginning and end of
a single dream), because it's scary, and quite plainly unwise
for our purposes and goals. It would actually be a cognitive
error to do so. What we will talk a bit about is memory, experience,
perception, and dreaming.
Let's go to the memory part,
first - there are some interesting realms to examine there. We
think that memory is a thing, but it isn't - not in the
sense we tend to think of things. When we make words for
processes or organs which represent them as separated, we run
some serious risks. The term memory is a place where those
risks bear deadly fruit. Memory, as it turns out, is demonstrably
unlike our common models of it, and even less like the simple
and brutish terms we use to point toward some rather subtle inward
momentums.
Recordings of human cognitive
experience are comprised of highly distributed componants. One
could probably ceaselessly separate, label and categorize such
members, but that's not my goal. What's more in line with my
intention is to explore a few primary anchors that are used during
recording. The first might be called character. We can 'record'
in certain characters of experience, and less well, or more poetically,
in others. For example, in shock, we don't tend to record well.
Similarly, in complete ecstasy, we may have trouble recording.
During either frame of circumstance, we may choose, instead of
a detailed report - a kind of symbolic moment, or small set of
such moments, to attempt to etch into our accessible memories.
Memory,
Metaphor, Recording and Time
Interestingly, most of us
are familiar with experiences which are, by their nature, either
very difficult to recall - or which seem, upon recollection,
to have somehow modified our experience of the elapsing of
time. The momentums involved are probably far less mysterious
than our researchers and academics - those to whom we've sacrificed
our own potential for credentialling our cognitive experience
and realities - suspect. They may well center largely on the
coupling between a quality of attention commonly referred to
as absorption - and the basic circumstances of attempts
at linearly metaphying one's experience. Absorption could be
likened to one's position of perspective, in the domain of self/other.
For example, someone who is bored and agitated will not flow
perceptually into their moment to moment environment as will
one who is poetically entranced with awe and wonder. Thus, to
the unabsorbed perspective, the terrain of experience and time
appears deadened - and seems easier to record. In fact,
what is being recorded is merely a set of signals of highly general
quality. But during a circumstance in which the self moves into
the background, and the amazing and often living detail of the
environment takes on a poetic or vitalizing detail - or we find
ourselves nearly changing places with that which our perceptions
behold - then we tend to record signals with greater range and
specificity at the same time.
We do encounter the coupling we discussed earlier, however
- to metaphor, and the process of creating or applying metaphors
- what we may term metafication. There are clues to this process
in our childhood development. We can find ample evidence in demonstration
of the fact that children, apparantly unlike adults, enjoy the
appreciation of various forms of media such as books and film
- more with each exposure. Why would there be such
a stark division between the children and the adults in this
arena? What is the foundational meaning of this difference?
In pursuing the expansion of these questions, we find threads
which imply they deserve long and careful exploration, but we
can see at a glance a few veins of cognitive treasure that can
be mined for some obvious progress. The first has to do with
metaphor, and the evolution of the inward spaces it creates and
occupies as a human develops - cognitively. Metaphor, it turns
out, is vastly more important in our moment to moment experience
- even metabolically, that anyone has ever implied. The domain
of metaphor, and the activities of metaphying our experience
- are as primary to human activity and survival as a functioning
brain or heart - but we hear little about such things, strangely
- when we hear more, we often hear less - due to the overwhelming
complexity of most discussions or assertions on the topic.
What we will do is mention
of few common features, as well as put forth a somewhat radical,
and nearly totally (internally) proven theory.
Dreamtexts: Reported experiences:
Nonsense.
Strange Poetry.
Musical language.
Text may morph or change each
time one refers to it visually, or attempts to focus upon its
elements - letters, words, etc.
Text may do the above while
one is reading it.
Text may optimize at the
level of the letter, word, sentence, paragraph or whole toward
something other than what it is in the first moment of reference,
and in succesive moments.
Often dreamtext is very hard
to recall with any clarity once awake.
Dreamtext often produces extreme
reality shifts if recalled in waking awareness.
If you find a dreamtext that does not change and is fairly
rational - you haven't found a text at all...but a door -
often to a shattering moment of cognitive exploration and expansion.
The DreamBook,
Woody Kamm - GoBang
Design
(914 . 237 . 8836)
....life passes slowly when you're lost in a dream
Such 'recallable and recordable'
texts have extremely unpredictable results upon waking humans
who use the same language as the dreamtext.
Revelation in the Bible
is a somewhat distored record of a dreamtext - and it certainly
has a profound effect on anyone willing to grant it some cognitive
purchase. It's quite possible that, in the original tongue and
amongst people who were of its cognitive period, Revelation
represented a shockingly powerful transgenic textual doorway
into completely new domains of cognition for at least
some of its early experiencers. This had nothing to
do with religion.
Transgenic dreamtexts
require no basis of reference in their recipients except languaging/parsing
abilities and a sort of basic willingness to step into the relationship
intentionally, and remain with the flow once inside.
Transgenic is here
used to mean:
The semi-invasive
modification of a cognitive being by particulate interpenetration
with 'factors' that 'assemble' and modify by their assembly
their domain of assembly (recursively) and - are modified by
this modification. There are lingual genes which possess a high
potency for certain (often sudden as well as scalar) transformative
catalyzations.
Ancient - Wewer Keohane