The digits in the figure below represent
the unreduced sums of the trines, according to whether we begin
with [left] Negative 1, [middle] Zero, or [right] One.
i.e:
[left] : -1 + 0 + 1 = 0
[middle] : 0+1+2 = 3
[right] 1+2+3 = 6
&c.
o:O:o
Each length represents one strand of a
(self-referencing) scalar spiral. The ‘end’ joins
to a new scale with(in) the beginning — thus forming a ring.
They also represent braided strands of a bracelet, seen as though
they are distinct. They are not merely proceeding forth from -1,
0 and 1 — they are multiply emanating into each numeric
entity uniquely.
Remember always that the idea of a numeric
base is merely an hypostatic instance of something far more
general which is the source of the One and the Many —
a living source, in every possible meaning of the word.
o:O:o
Essentially, the conversation is one of
reflections, and there are two modes. The first
mode of reflection is direct [center column]
: 12 reflects to 21 in the Mother. The binding of 12
and 21 creates ‘two balls’ — each of which sums
to 3. The second reflection in the Mother ‘came first’
because it happens backward in time. Coming ‘after’
the first — this ‘echo’ utilizes a gap to ‘run
back and precede’ its predecessor. The pattern is: ‘direct’,
‘pre-echo’. The game is atemporal in basis.
The ‘four balls of 3’
in the Mother become the basis of the first reflection in the
fatherChild — 33. This second mode of reflection [right
column] ‘utilizes a vessel or agent’ — this
is an indirect-assisted relation where the entities
are reflectively combined via an intermediary, however it may
also be understood as taking place between the doubled characters
themselves [and thus the agent-assisted paradigm dissolves].
o:O:o
I consider this to be akin a ‘living
echo’ of the first conversation — yet it
is also a transtemporal conversation. Although it is not in a
given language — the ‘place’ where
these matters are crucial forms a strange octopus whose tentacles
end in any possible form of language. This ‘conversation’
thus ‘primordially inspires’ every instance of every
possible kind of language, in any possible dimension or collective
— everywhen.
o:O:o
As we travel from ‘void’, to
‘nought‘ to ‘ought’ and beyond, we can
observe a dance of reflective echoes — sometimes enacted
across a mirror — and other across an ‘in between’
or gap.
These two modes of reflection are given
[by me], yet there are many others awaiting the attention of anyone
curious enough to proceed. To ‘know about’ this feature
of numerism is useless — it is only in direct
personal exploration that the gift is revealed and magnified
into an inexhaustible velocity.
o:O:o
These symmetries are atemporal, they began
‘after’ themselves, in ‘the before’...
and ‘before themselves’ in the after — and with
themselves in the instant. It is useful to explore them as though
the ‘circles’ which indicate their relation are
actually linked S shapes.
For example, start at 12-o’clock
on the circle surrounding 12 [center column], and follow the curve
clockwise, downward. At the center proceed onto 21’s circle,
following it down and counterclockwise. At the center, proceed
to the larger circle of (0)3, following it clockwise. At the center
again, one follows the circle around 30 counterclockwise. At the
‘final’ center, proceed back to 12 and repeat indefinitely.
-1 : 0 : 1
